The Rise of the Functional Service Providers Model
Emergence of the FSP model
The traditional outsourcing model of having a single, large provider handling
all business processes and services for a company has significant drawbacks.
These include lack of flexibility and agility to adapt to changing business
needs, vendor lock-in risks, and higher costs of maintaining large, long-term
contracts. In response, a new paradigm known as the Functional Service Provider
(FSP) model has emerged in the past decade.
Under the FSP model, different business functions and services are carved out
and provided by specialized third-party vendors according to their core
competencies. For example, a company may engage separate Functional Service
Providers for services like finance and accounting, human resources, marketing,
facilities management, technology infrastructure support, and more. This allows
companies to work with best-in-class providers for each function based on their
capabilities instead of being tied to a single, large vendor.
Benefits of increased specialization
By focusing solely on specific functions, Functional
Service Providers develop deep expertise that dedicated in-house teams
may lack due to the breadth of responsibilities. They stay abreast of the
latest technologies, tools, and best practices for their specialized domain
through continuous learning and investments. This specialization allows Functional
Service Providers to provide services more efficiently through standardized
processes and economies of scale.
Companies working with expert Functional Service Providers gain access to
capabilities that would be uneconomical or difficult to develop in-house.
Specialized vendors can also more nimbly adapt their services to the evolving
needs of multiple clients across industries. This improves the speed, quality,
and cost-effectiveness of service delivery. Partnering with best-fit providers
on non-core functions also frees up companies to focus maximum resources on
their core competencies and growth opportunities.
More flexibility and choice through
modular contracts
Rather than being tied down by large, long-term contracts with a single vendor,
the FSP model allows companies the flexibility to engage multiple best-of-breed
providers through modular contracts. These targeted, outcome-based agreements
are scoped to specific deliverables with defined key performance indicators.
If a provider is unable to consistently meet expectations or a company's needs
change, they can easily transition modules to another specialized vendor.
Modular contracts also give companies the ability to scale services up or down
quickly based on demand, without major contract renegotiations. With improved
governance focused on transparency and accountability, companies gain more
control and choice over their outsourcing partnerships.
Reduced costs and increased innovation
By strengthening competition in the market through modular contracts, companies
benefit from far more competitive pricing from Functional Service Providers
than the take-it-or-leave-it deals often provided by large system integrators
and outsourcers. Functional Service Providers also have stronger incentives to
continuously innovate and improve service quality in order to retain existing
clients and win new business.
This translates to reduced total cost of ownership for companies over time
through better management of vendor performance, negotiation leverage, and
technology advances. It also promotes an ecosystem of collaborative
partnerships rather than adversarial relationships between service buyers and
providers.
Addressing the challenges of distributed
delivery
While specialization brings significant benefits, effective management is
needed to coordinate these distributed work arrangements across multiple Functional
Service Providers. Some key challenges that companies need to overcome include:
- Integration of disparate systems - Information handoffs and integration
points between different FSP modules need careful planning and governance to
ensure seamless end-to-end processes and data visibility.
- Vendor interoperability - Service level agreements must account for
dependencies between vendors to avoid finger-pointing during incidents. Open
communication channels are important.
- Quality and consistency - Central governance is required to maintain
uniformity of delivery across the FSP network according to the company's
quality standards.
- Transition management - Switching vendors or bringing new ones onboard needs
minimal disruption through transition planning, knowledge transfer, and change
management.
- Contract management complexity - Coordinating multiple outcome-based
contracts requires more effort than a single comprehensive agreement. Robust
governance reduces this overhead.
Continued innovation in tools, automation of integration points, established
frameworks for distributed agile delivery, and greater vendor alignment through
industry consortiums are helping address these challenges and maximize the
benefits of the FSP model. Those that master distributed delivery coordination
will gain significant competitive advantage.
Get More Insights on Functional Service Providers
Comments
Post a Comment